How do RTK, vision, and LiDAR technologies differ in robotic lawn mowers
Share
Comparing RTK, Vision, and LiDAR Technologies in Robotic Lawn Mowers
Robotic lawn mowers are evolving rapidly, with RTK, vision, and LiDAR technologies each providing unique approaches to navigation and obstacle avoidance. Here’s how they differ:
RTK (Real-Time Kinematic) Technology
How It Works:
Uses satellite signals and a fixed base station to deliver centimeter-level positioning accuracy. The mower receives real-time correction data from the base station, allowing it to follow precise mowing paths without the need for boundary wires.
Strengths:
Extremely accurate (within 1–2 cm)
Ideal for large, open areas and complex patterns
Reduces overlap and missed spots
Wire-free operation
Limitations:
Performance can be affected by signal loss from trees, buildings, or poor weather
Requires initial setup and calibration of the base station
Higher cost due to additional hardware
Vision-Based Navigation
How It Works:
Relies on high-definition cameras and AI algorithms to identify grass, obstacles, and boundaries. The mower “sees” its environment and adapts its path accordingly, often without any physical or virtual boundaries.
Strengths:
No need for wires, antennas, or base stations
Adaptive to changing environments and landscaping
Enhanced safety—can recognize and avoid pets, people, and wildlife
Easy setup: just place the mower and start
Limitations:
Dependent on lighting conditions; performance may drop at night or in deep shade
May struggle with highly irregular or complex lawn edges
Requires ongoing software updates to improve recognition abilities
LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging)
How It Works:
Uses laser pulses to create a 3D map of the lawn and its obstacles. LiDAR sensors scan the environment, enabling precise mapping, real-time positioning, and dynamic obstacle avoidance—even in the dark or adverse weather.
Strengths:
Provides omnidirectional, centimeter-level mapping and navigation
Unaffected by lighting or weather conditions
Excels at detecting a wide range of obstacles, including irregular shapes
No need for boundary wires or base stations; setup is often quick and app-based
Limitations:
Higher cost and increased power consumption
Technology is newer, so fewer models are available
Battery life may be reduced due to sensor demands
Summary Table
| Technology | Positioning Method | Key Pros | Key Cons | Best For |
| RTK | Satellite + base station | High precision, wire-free, large areas | Signal loss, setup required, cost | Large, open, complex lawns |
| Vision | Camera + AI | No wires, adaptive, safety, easy setup | Lighting dependent, edge detection | Residential, changing layouts |
| LiDAR | Laser 3D mapping | All-weather, 3D mapping, obstacle avoidance | Cost, power use, newer tech | Complex, obstacle-rich lawns |
Key Takeaways
RTK is best for precision and large-scale mowing but needs clear skies and setup.
Vision offers flexibility and safety, ideal for homes with pets or dynamic environments.
LiDAR delivers robust, all-condition navigation and obstacle avoidance, excelling in challenging, cluttered, or shaded lawns.
Choosing the right technology depends on your lawn’s size, complexity, and the level of automation and reliability you require.